- ...
- VOTING TO LEGALIZE 12-20 MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS:
PROS: No costs in money for USA in trying to uncover and deporting all illegal citizens. Rescuing Illegal aliens from poor situations in their countries. More businesses keep money because no fines for businesses who hire or give services to illegal aliens. (Hospitalization, Dr. Licences, etc.) No decisions needed to be made about dividing families up.
CONS: It will head our country for a financial Depression for the tax burden will be put onto the Middle Class because the tax taken out of the paycheck of the new citizen will be far less than the health/life/ benefits given back to big families. Insurance rates will skyrocket. They cannot read English—more money for traffic signs, voting, etc.—more traffic accidents, costs more to explain benefits in Spanish, 27% are illegal aliens in prisons (which costs us over $8,000 a day for TV, food, rent, A/C,) etc. Finally, the illegal aliens will be taking jobs away from the regular US citizens and also legally allowing the terrorists to come and destroy our country as lawful legal citizens? We will be bringing in a lot of unskilled labor.
- Deregulating Borders/ &Building NAFTA Hwy to Connect Mexico to Canada through the USA.
PROS: Less Border Patrolmen jobs needed and less problems passing people through the gates since there would be less restrictions. Increase trading of goods to increase prosperity.
CONS: More terrorists attacks with open borders. USA will lose sovereignty over major road(s) and we would pay tax to other countries …whatever they want. USA will lose sovereignty to the two or three other countries, because they will overpower us in the vote concerning roads and everything else. Later, we would lose sovereignty to everyone. If we cannot travel on our own roads without severe taxes (The other countries may use the tax money to turn around and destroy us), this could help cause us to go into Recession or worse, another war to regain our sovereignty.
- Vote for the L.O.S.T. or Sea Treaty
PROS: None
CONS: USA will lose rights to put our military or any ships for any reason on the sea without UN permission which will also affect whether they approve of our export and import taxes to other countries as to whether we can put our ships on the seas. (They would use all kinds of excuses that our fuel, etc would ruin their sea treasures, etc.) They will also profit from harvesting the sea treasures (including oil) in and on the seas (even if we discovered it, ways to use it or if we made up new inventions or vitamins from the sea treasures. The UN would get all great profits, not us. Because the UN could charge us whatever they wanted for us to get back the Sea Treasures that we found, if they even want to sell it back to us. Also because they would control the Seas, the UN would decide who goes through the Panama Canal and if so, when and at what price…all this with UN in Control? If they were mad at us, we would pay dearly and have lost our sovereignty. The UN would completely control the seas.
- Vote For North American Union (combining all 3 countries together -- USA, Mexico and Canada)
PROS: It would be easier to go pass between countries with ID and with the same money and not have to exchange it at the borders. We would have unified forms for Dr. Licensees, voting forms, or any federal forms to fill out, etc.
CONS: Deflation of money value would happen when combined with Canada and Mexico. USA will lose sovereignty more and more over laws of the land, handing out fistfuls of money to the other countries, because Canada and Mexico will overpower us in the vote. This would cause us to go into Recession or Depression and no longer be the military might that we used to be in the world. We and all our allies, would fall under a dictatorship.
- For voting to give back the Military Chaplains their Religious Freedoms
PROS: The rules in the Military that is being practiced now, punishing the Chaplains for preaching outside the Chapel, needs to be corrected. Those in authority over them, if they do not correct it, need to be punished. It goes against the First Amendment of Religious Freedoms in the Bill of Rights. There needs to be great retribution for those in the Military who have suffered, like losing their retirement.
CONS: None. It goes against the laws of the land.
- Vote to Support Israel and their lands
PROS: Since our Legislator's are supposed to represent the people and about 80 % are Christian, according to the Jewish and Christian Holy Word (Genesis 17), Israel is a complete nation (Borders given in book) given to the Jews for an Everlasting Covenant…which means forever by God. It should never be given away. (Genesis 12:3) If land is given away, it will appear to cause peace for a short time but whatever happened in the past, has and will cause greater battles both now and in the future. Both the Palestinians and the Jews want all the lands of Israel. But only the Jews have the right claim to it according to the Jewish and Christian Holy Scriptures.
CONS: None. It only appears to give peace at the moment by giving up their lands but the battles have only gotten worse. The Middle East has great lands which they could give the Palestinians. But the Palestinians and Moslems do not just want the land of Israel, they want to wipe out the Jews. (Koran)
- ...
- ...
- Voting for State Legislation vs Federal Legislation concerning Pro-Life. Pro-Traditional Marriage Issues
PROS: More harmony and less fighting among the Legislators for a season but not so for the states.
CONS: It would allow some states to legalize murdering and torturing babies. Also some states would have civil lawsuits on same sex marriage which when the homosexuals change states to another state, they would try to challenge the new states laws, and ACLU lawyers would get rich, etc.? If it is not handled correctly now, a future civil war between states (like 1865), will break out in years to come because those two issues were not handled correctly, federally. (Slavery should have been handled correctly, federally…not state-wide.)
- Support Border Patrolmen Ramos and Compeon's Release from Prison with Retrobution
PROS: Our Country is based on Christian Values which says right is right and wrong is wrong. These two Border Patrolmen were doing their jobs, confiscating 1 million dollars worth of drugs to help prevent our Youth from being tempted and destroying families. Instead of their being rewarded for their work, they were sent to prison. Why? Because authorities above them did everything possible to allow lies in the courtroom including giving clemency to the Illegal Drug Smuggler to come back from Mexico to the USA courtroom and perjure himself to testify against them. Several times, hundreds of thousands of people requested to set them free but there was a blockage of a Hispanic Lobbyists who blocked the Pardon. Why? Now, more Border Patrolmen are intimidated by this act, to do their job. A dual wrong.
CONS: None. the Drug Smuggler claimed the Border Patrolmen shot him in his seat. The Border Patrolmen shot because he was running away and thought he had a gun. The Drug Smuggler claims he did not have a gun. Whether he did or did not, they had the right to shoot because he would not stop. In this case, the criminal had more rights than the heroes ???? After the trial of the two Border patrolmen, the Criminal came back to sue America for $1 million to get his drug money back. Earlier, when he came back from Mexico to testify against the Border Patrolmen, he brought back more drugs to sell (unknown to the USA, at the time), and finally the third time, his coming across the border, he got caught with the drugs. Finally, they proved he perjured himself against the two, in their trials. So, why aren't the Border Patrolmen out?
- Voting for Socialized Medicine run by the government
PROS: Everyone could have health insurance and have medical treatment.
CONS: Taxes will sharply rise for those who are working to pay for those who are not working. The Waiting Periods for those who are waiting for the doctors in the clinics, may end up in days. The waiting period for operations may end up waiting a year or so, including serious operations. (check out Canada or England). Many may quit working since they automatically have health insurance.
- Vote for Hate Crimes /EDNA
PROS: None. Our Bill of Rights and Constitution declares that all men are created equal. No one should be punished greater than any other group. We should all get the same punishment for wrong doing.
CONS: Not only is it wrong to create greater punishment for any one group, but it would be taking away the Religious Freedoms in the Bill of Rights for someone not to be able to quote scriptures or believe the way their religion dictates. Of all people who should have their religious freedoms, it should be the Christians who started this country for that purpose and the majority of the people who have the Christian faith.
- ...
- ...
- ...
- ...
- Do you support Religious Freedoms in Public Schools that were just passed by the National and State laws?
PROS: 1)Texas HB 1287 (Passed 5/7/07 )Demanding all high schools have Bible Curriculum as a half a credit as an Elective by 9/1/09 as our Founding Fathers intended. The main reason they started public schools in our country, was to learn how to read the Bible (just look at the first New England Primer printed textbooks of 1777 as it was over 65% prayers and Scriptures of the Holy Bible)
and 2) HB #3678 (Effective 6/8/07) Today, in all grades public schools according to Both U.S. Legislative and U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Religious Expression in their classwork, homework, art, and also verbal expression and activities at appropriate times, etc.? This will help change behavior so they would have manners, have a better atmosphere to learn in (safety & quiet), & have a greater desire to learn. In turn, this would have great increases in academic scores, as before they took God out of our Public Schools in 1963, as they have not been able to reach the same SAT scores through the years.
CONS: Other religions might come in if there were weak churches and prayer warriors. Therefore, the power might not be as great to make changes in the school system, majority–wise.
- ...
- ...
- ...
- ...
- Support impeaching Judges who make up their own laws or are a Constructionist for passing laws "that includes" those that are illegal because they conflict with the Federal Constitution.
PROS: The Federal Constitution should have priority over any preceding laws. The Judges take an oath to interpret the laws according to the Federal Constitution and the State Constitution, only if the State does not go against the Federal Constitution. Some Judges have continued passing the old laws that CONFLICT WITH THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION even though the law should have been illegal and the past and present judge impeached.
CONS: None.
- ...
- ...
- ...
|
